Should law on royal succession be changed?

While reform seems fair and reasonable it could open a can of worms — will the same rules apply to daughters and Catholics?
Queen Victoria, seated, with Princess Maud and Princess Victoria of Schleswig Holstein, photographed by Princess Victoria of Wales in 1892
Queen Victoria, seated, with Princess Maud and Princess Victoria of Schleswig Holstein, photographed by Princess Victoria of Wales in 1892

Sir, The proposed changes to the rules for the royal succession (“Will and Kate’s first daughter would take the throne under plans to reform succession”, Oct 13) are welcome but do they go far enough?

Removing the bar on marriage to Roman Catholics is a distinction without a difference. Catholics will still be unable to succeed unless able to “join in communion with” the Church of England — a requirement which equally bans other Christians in the same position and all non-Christians. That rule, devised during the very different geopolitics of the 1680s, is no longer defensible, above all in our more diverse society. Catholics in Canada and Australia might also wonder why the exclusion should continue.

The Church of England may argue